Thursday, April 23, 2015

Reorganization and violations from war vs BlackHaze

 In light of how poorly the low-level players in our clan consistently perform, I've decided to change the clan to invite only and add requirements for joining.

Namely, to join players must have -
Town Hall level of at least 7
Spell Factory level of at least 3
Troop capacity of at least 180
Clan Castle level of at least 3
Dragons unlocked

Players that are currently in the clan are not required to meet the requirements, but if they are kicked for not following the rules or leave, they will need to meet the requirements to be let back in.

To fit this policy, we are changing to invite only but removing the trophy limit.


In unrelated news, here are the violations from the last war:

Attack guidelines violations: Will be kicked if offense is repeated in next war.
f1 50 - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used level 2 balloons
Baburinka - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improperly executed attack (deployed healer while air defense was still up)
- Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (barch)
Ternar Velda - Failed to deal with clan castle troops
Gman051 - Used level 1 balloons, used goblins in war, failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (giants and barbs with no archers)
Wizz - Failed to draw out clan castle troops


Unused attacks: Will be kicked if any attacks are missed in next war
Mikkeline
f1 50

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Warnings from war vs OTOMOTIF KALSEL


Unused attacks: The following players will be kicked if they miss any attacks in the next war:
captin dave

Attack guidelines violations: The following players will be kicked if the offense (listed) is repeated in the next war.
Wizz: Didn't deal with clan castle troops.
captin dave: Used level 2 wizards and balloons
PapiJumps: Didn't deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (giant-healer with only 5 giants and one healer)

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Policy Updates:

I have made a couple of minor updates to the policies I will use in order to improve our war performance:

  1. I will intentionally exclude any players with "new" under their names from war. This should reduce the number of players who leave during the course of a war (which hurts our war performance ATM).
  2. I will now begin to enforce clan rule #7 to reduce the number of inactive members in our clan set to opt-out. This will take effect halfway through the current league season and should only affect inactive players (Furthermore, I will only enforce it on players set to opt-out because players set to opt-in are kicked if inactive anyways).

Sunday, April 12, 2015

Attack guidelines violations in war vs BASPEHLIVAN

The following people violated the attack guidelines in the last war, resulting in failed (0 or 1 star attack) attacks. They will be kicked if the same violation is repeated in the next war, so I recommend they read the guidelines and follow them (or at avoid the same mistake they made last time).

Parsa: Used level 2 balloons, improper strategy (archer spam), didn't use full army
Sam: Failed to deal with clan castle troops
butter playz: Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used level 2 wizards, improper strategy (barch with just a few giants)
Brandon: Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (barbarian spam), attacked 2-starred base (unsuccessfully)
mantou: Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (barbarian spam), used level 2 wizards
Jasmine: Should have deployed giants earlier to tank for wizards.
Arjun: Used goblins in war, improper attack strategy (archer spam + goblins)
dragon man: Failed to deal with clan castle troops (didn't draw them out), improper strategy (basically barbarians spam)
armen: Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper strategy (basically barch)

Sunday, March 8, 2015

The Apocalypse (part 2)

 The second war with new policy went fairly well. We still had 6 people not participate and get kicked (compared to the 12 last time), but this time we actually had more failed attacks. Literally all of the people who failed attacks failed to deal with the clan castle troops. Always, always deal with clan castle troops. 8 people have received warnings for not following the attack guidelines:

Warning: Will be kicked if offense (listed) is repeated.
Tars Tarkas - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used level 2 balloons
brebri - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (barbarian spam)
cozy - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used level 2 balloons
canh sat pcccc - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used goblins in war
MR.simple - Attacked 3-starred opponent (wasted attack), didn't deal with defenses
my love - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (archer spam vs 2 mortars), used single lightning spell on mortar, used level 1 balloons and wizards
Andrew - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, improper attack strategy (barbarian spam)
Ptony TJ Rufus - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, deployed healers before air defenses were down
mayur - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used goblins in war

I don't have time to check if the base guidelines are being followed right now, so consider this war a freebee in that respect. However, I will be checking on them eventually, so be sure to read them and modify your base to fit them.

Friday, March 6, 2015

The Apocalypse

In keeping with the policy laid out in my last post, 12 people have been kicked for missing both attacks in the last war. 4 people missed one attack and will be given a warning this time, but if they miss an attack in the next war I will kick them:

Warning: Will be kicked if miss one attack in next war they participate in.
Tars Tarkas
brebri
King Grizzly
Getrekt

As for following the attack guidelines, the most blatant offenders will be given a warning and kicked if the same offense is repeated next war:

Warning: Will be kicked if offense (listed) is repeated.
DiamondMAN - Attacked base far above his level, improper attack strategy (wizard spam)
Getrekt - Failed to destroy exposed defenses or exposed town hall, improper attack strategy (barbarian spam)
tyler - Failed to destroy exposed defenses or exposed town hall, used goblins in war
skiben - Attacked 3-starred base (wasted attack)
King Grizzly - Failed to deal with clan castle troops, used goblins in war, used lvl 1 balloons

I decided not to check the base guidelines in this war since a lot of the people with offending bases got kicked already for being inactive, but I will probably check and give out warnings in the next war.

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Change of Policy: Strict War Rule Enforcement

I'm sick and tired of people not using war attacks and not reading the guidelines page. Let's make this simple. You have two options:
  1. Set your clan war status to opt-out.
  2. Read and follow the clan war rules, war base guidelines, and attack guidelines.
If you do not opt out of war by the war after this next war (2.5 days from now) and fail to follow the rules, you will be kicked. If you fail to follow the base or attack guidelines, you will be given a warning (via a blog post mentioned by clan mail) and then kicked if you don't shape up.

I didn't want to have to go this far, but there are only about 3 or 4 people in the clan who actually follow the rules consistently, so I've been forced to enact strict punishments. If you do not want to be kicked, opt out or get serious about war and read my advice. I'm all for fun, but it's no fun when the vast majority of you suck at clan wars and won't read the advice I've posted on this blog that would make you suck less.

If you want to discuss this change, please do so in the comments of this blog post so your comment doesn't get lost in the clan chat.

Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Update: War opt-in/opt-out, clan XP

With the new update, Supercell added the ability for clan leaders to choose which members of a clan to take to war and for members to select whether or not they wish to be included in wars. I will be reworking the clan structure a bit to take advantage of this new functionality, as well as to earn clan XP so we can get clan perks.

Here are some changes:
  1. I will no longer be kicking people for incomplete war attacks. However, if you do not wish to participate in a war, please set your status to opt-out, and if you fail to make war attacks I may leave you out of wars even if you are opted in.
  2. The clan is being changed back to "Anyone can join". This is because we can now have people in our clan without them participating in war and having more people participate in wars results in (slightly) more clan XP. If we get too many members (that is, if the clan gets too full), then we'll change to "invite only" again.
  3. When choosing who will participate in wars, I will attempt to exclude people who opt out and choose the members who have earned the most stars for the clan in previous wars. This means I will be excluding people both for not making attacks and for failing attacks. If you wish to remain in the clan war roster, make sure you keep earning stars for the clan. And don't worry if you aren't in a war and want to be, I'll be cycling out people who didn't earn any stars in war to give people who weren't in that war a chance to prove themselves.
  4. The rules page and clan description will be updated to reflect these changes.

Friday, February 20, 2015

Review of wars 7-9

We actually won two of the past three wars, which is good. We've finally dug ourselves out of our losing record. The good news is that if this keeps up, we'll be able to get war win bonuses to pay off our war attacks. The bad news is that to keep this up, we have to keep making war attack. :P

Regarding incomplete war attacks, I have decided to revamp the system for deciding when to kick people. The new system is that people will be kicked if they miss more than half of their attacks in a 5-war period. Since there are 10 attacks in a 5-war period, people will be kicked after missing 6 attacks during a 5-war period. This means that two people (JagMaster and GeorgeElmassih) are above the threshold for being kicked after war 9, but they won't be kicked unless they miss more attacks after the new system is in place.

Incomplete raids war 7:

2:
JagMaster
EditedSpoon100

1:
DastardlyDragon
Fortebari
E174Ymk2
GeorgeElmassih

Incomplete raids war 8:

2:
JagMaster
GeorgeElmassih
Ternar Velda (Missed 2 attacks in past 4 wars)

1:
DastardlyDragon
Fortebari (Missed 3 attacks in past 4 wars)
mario
lior123

Incomplete raids war 9:

2:
JagMaster (Missed 6 attacks in past 4 wars) (Will be kicked if misses any attacks in war 10)
DastardlyDragon (Missed 4 attacks in past 4 wars) (Will be kicked if misses both attacks in war 10)
mario (Missed 3 attacks in past 4 wars)
lior123 (Missed 3 attacks in past 4 wars)

1:
EditedSpoon100 (Missed 5 attacks in past 4 wars) (Will be kicked if misses any attacks in war 10)
E174Ymk2 (Missed 3 attacks in past 4 wars)
GeorgeElmassih (Missed 6 attacks in past 4 wars) (Will be kicked if misses any attacks in war 10)

Friday, February 13, 2015

Review of wars 4-6

Well, 3 wars since my last update, we've lost 3 more times. We've not only had a lot of incomplete attacks, but also a lot of attacks that were poorly executed and failed. If you find yourself losing a lot of war raids, take a look at the attack guidelines page. I may start counting attacks that fail due to obvious problems addressed by that page as wasted, such as DastardlyDragon's raid in this last war which because his army consisted of goblins (which should NEVER be used in war) and no way to deal with the clan castle troops except for one lone wizard.

Unused/wasted attacks war 4 (vs Kanodart):

1
gh slim (4 total)
Tytan (2 total)
Fortebari (4 total)
EditedSpoon100 (1 total)
GeorgeElmassih (3 total)
mario (3 total)

2
E174Ymk2 (3 total)

Unused/wasted attacks war 5 (vs beastmode):

1
Fortebari (5 total)
DastardlyDragon (2 total)
E174Ymk2 (4 total)

2
gh slim (6 total)
Tytan (4 total)
EditedSpoon100 (3 total)
GeorgeElmassih (5 total)

Unused/wasted attacks war 6 (vs taiwan farshing)

1
Fortebari (6 total) (Will be kicked if inactive in war 7)
E174Ymk2 (5 total)
Reaper (3 total)


2
gh slim (8 total) (Will be kicked if inactive in war 7)
Tytan (6 total) (Will be kicked if inactive in war 7)
EditedSpoon100 (3 total)
GeorgeElmassih (5 total)

Sunday, February 8, 2015

Regarding War Attacks

I have a lot of things to say about war attacks, so I decided to lump them into one post. There are a few unrelated sections, but all are important:

Regarding wasted war attacks:

I saw several violations of war rule #2 in the last war (and in this war so far), so let me make that more clear:

DO NOT attack with an incomplete army (such as a single troop) to make it look like you used your war attack without actually attacking. That is not only wasting your attack, that is being duplicitous and will result in an INSTANT BAN. That's right, if anyone does that in the future, they will be instabanned. If you don't want to use your attacks, be honest about it.

DO NOT attack a base that has already been 3-starred. That is a wasted attack and will be treated the same as an unused attack.

DO NOT attack as base that has already been 2-starred (or even 1-starred for that matter) if there is a target that hasn't been starred that you can defeat.

DO NOT attack a base much higher level than your army. Only make attacks that have a reasonable chance of succeeding. The point of the rules regarding attacks is to make sure everyone's helping us win the war, and attacking a high-level base with a weak army isn't helping.

Regarding failed war attacks:

A lot of our war attacks fail for one reason - the attacker doesn't deal with clan castle troops. Please, please, take a look at the attack guidelines. Be sure to carefully read the section on clan castle troops and always deal with them, I'd say 90% of our failed attacks came from that simple problem. Also, be sure to check out the strategy specific to your town hall level. In particular I see a lot of people using low-level balloons and/or goblins in war attack, neither of which are effective at all. I don't want to make a rule that requires people to follow the attack guidelines, but I'll have to if people continue to ignore them.

Regarding incomplete war attacks:

The following people didn't complete attacks in war 3:

2 incomplete attacks:
gh slim (3 total)
skunkfunker (6 total) (Will be kicked if inactive in war 4)
shrek (5 total) (Will be kicked if inactive in war 4)
GeorgeElmassih (2 total)
Fortebari (wasted) (3 total)

1 incomplete attack:
Tytan (1 total)
E174Ymk2 (1 total)
B. A. Barracus (2 total)

As noted, shrek and skunkfunker are in danger of being kicked if they don't complete attacks in the current war as they have carried out only 1 and 0 (respectively) attacks since the rules took effect. (skunk hasn't been kicked yet because he participated in past wars.

Wednesday, February 4, 2015

Rule Violations From War 2 (vs X-BOW)

Our second clan war with the new clan rules didn't go very well, primarily because we still had a lot of unused attacks. Luckily, our next war should go better simply because I kicked 9 people who were inactive in both of the past 2 wars.


Here are the unused attacks from people who are still in the clan (and the total over the last 2 wars):

2 unused attacks:
skunkfunker (4 total)
Reaper (2 total)
mario (2 total)
cozy (2 total)

1 unused attack:
gh slim (1 total)
DastardlyDragon (1 total)
B. A. Barracus (2 total)
shrek (3 total)


Also, I looked at all the war bases and took note of what should be changed in each. Take a look at the base guidelines page and look at the guidelines mentioned next to your name:

gh slim - war 3,4 gen 5,6
skunkfunker - war 2,3,4,5,6 gen 5,6
Andrew - war 3,5,6 gen 4
Tytan - war 4,5 gen 4
Fortebari - war 5 gen 4
DastardlyDragon - war 4,5 gen 6; also builders hut in corner
EditedSpoon100 - war 3
E174Ymk2 - war 3,5,6 gen 6
B. A. Barracus - war 3
shrek - war 4,5 gen 4
GeorgeElmassih - war 3,5 gen 6
brendan - war 2,3,6 gen 3,4,6
Tars Tarkas - war 2,5 gen 4
Diggy37 - gen 4
v.39 - war 3,5,6 gen 6
reaper - war 2,5,6 gen 4
mario -war 5,6 gen 4
cozy - war 2,4,5,6 gen 1,2,4,5

Also, I fixed the attack guidelines page (it wasn't linked from the tab bar at first) and I will be adding to it soon, so take a look at it if you need help with your war attacks.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

Rule Violations From the First War, Advice For Your Attacks

In the first war, we had quite a few rule violations:

Improper War Bases:
See the Base Guidelines page for things to correct about war bases. Well over half of the clan fell under this category. If this issues remain unaddressed for too long, I will start kicking the offenders, although I'll wait several more wars before I start kicking people for war base design.

Offenders:
  1. skunkfunker
  2. DroidFreak (forgot to change it from troll design. XD)
  3. Andrew
  4. Fortebari
  5. DastardlyDragon
  6. EditedSpoon100
  7. E174Ymk2
  8. Ptony TJ Rufus
  9. shrek
  10. GeorgeElmassih
  11. Peter
  12. brendan
  13. Shwa
  14. ashdyn
  15. v.39
  16. Reaper
  17. The Best
  18. Tookie
  19. [insert name I can't type here]
  20. mario
  21. Kevin Lim
  22. ahmad
  23. [insert other name I can't type here]
  24. The Kolk
  25. TheKing_Devil
Unused War Attacks:
The clan rules require all members to use their war attacks. I WILL start kicking people after this next war if they missed both attacks in this last war and miss both in the next one (Although I may show grace to longtime members who have attacked in past wars).

Double Offenders (used no attacks):
  1. skunkfunker
  2. shrek
  3. Peter
  4. ashdyn
  5. The Best
  6. Tookie
  7. [insert name I can't type here] 
  8. Kevin Lim
  9. [insert other name I can't type here] 
  10. The Kolk
  11. TheKing_Devil
Single Offenders (used 1 of 2 attacks):
  1. Fortebari
  2. B. A. Barracus
  3. Shwa
  4. ahmad
War Attack Advice:
Since I noticed we had a lot of botched raids, I made an attack guidelines page that should help. Take a look at it to help you improve your attack strategies.

Saturday, January 31, 2015

We are now "Invite only", but anyone can still join.

We recently recieved a massive influx of Nubscrubs, to the point where we almost hit the 50 member limit. In order to reduce the number of people joining, we are now invite only. In order to be accepted, you have to find the code word on the rules page and use it in your join request. Hint: It's panda

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Welcome to the Nubscrubs Clan Blog

We are the Nubscrubs, a Clash of Clans clan dedicated to having fun and pwning people in clan war.

The point of this blog is mainly to host the clan rules page, as well as a base guidelines page to help our members design better bases. Be sure to read the clan rules! Repeatedly breaking the rules will result in being kicked from the clan.

The rules will go into effect on February 1, 2015. After than point, we'll try to keep track of whether or not people obey them and if they continue to not obey them for a while, they will be kicked. I wish we didn't have to do this, but it's necessary to enforce the rules if we want them to be followed.